{"id":2892,"date":"2015-03-12T11:59:02","date_gmt":"2015-03-12T11:59:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/?p=2892"},"modified":"2015-03-12T04:06:14","modified_gmt":"2015-03-12T04:06:14","slug":"edited-collection-newly-available-apology-of-culture-religion-and-culture-in-russian-thought","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/2015\/03\/12\/edited-collection-newly-available-apology-of-culture-religion-and-culture-in-russian-thought\/","title":{"rendered":"Edited collection newly available: Apology of Culture: Religion and Culture in Russian Thought<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Newly available this month: Apology of Culture: Religion and Culture in Russian Thought<\/em><\/strong>, edited by Artur Mrowczynski-Van Allen, Teresa Obolevitch, and Pawel Rojek (Pickwick Publications \/ Wipf & Stock; March 2, 2015; 252pp+).<\/p>\n

[Purchase: Wipf & Stock<\/a> | Amazon.com<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Description:<\/p>\n

Contemporary philosophy and theology are ever more conscious of the fact that the model of relations between religion and culture developed in modernity is fundamentally flawed. The processes of the secularization of society, culture, and even religion are rooted in the dualistic vision of religion and culture introduced in the late Middle Ages. In seeking a way out, we need to explore domains of culture unaffected by Western European secular thinking.<\/p>\n

\u000bRussian thought is remarkably well prepared to formulate an alternative to secular modernity. Indeed, in Russian culture there was neither a Renaissance nor an Enlightenment. Eastern Christianity retained an integral patristic vision of human nature that had not been divided into separate “natural” and “supernatural” elements. These pre- and non-modern visions are now gaining exceptional value in the postmodern reality in which we find ourselves. The heritage of Russian Christian thought may serve as a source of inspiration for alternative approaches to religion and culture. In this respect, Russian thought may be compared with nouvelle theologie, Radical Orthodoxy, and other recent movements in Christian postsecular thought. For this reason it remains astonishingly contemporary.<\/p>\n

Praise for\u00a0Apology of Culture<\/em>:<\/p>\n

“Apology of Culture<\/i> is a timely volume addressing the unity of theology and culture in the conditions of extreme secularization of all forms of life. The appeal to the Russian religious philosophical thought provides a fresh look at the place of humanity in the world where diminution of communities and alienating tendencies of technology become threatening factors of its stability. The volume complements sources on ‘Radical Orthodoxy’ by advancing the scope of modern critique of secularism, atheism, and nihilism.” \u2014\u00a0Alexei Nesteruk, Senior Research Lecturer, University of Portsmouth, UK<\/p>\n

“Faced with the twin threat of moral relativism and secular nihilism, much of Christianity has become far too defensive and pietistic. To restore and renew Christendom, we need to re-enchant religious transcendence and recover the archaic western wisdom in a more culturally mediated and dispersed idiom. A more imaginatively ‘incultured’ faith can unite the patristic fusion of biblical revelation with Greco-Roman philosophy to the Romantic blending of high with popular and folk culture. These extraordinarily rich essays highlight the crucial contribution of Russian religious thought to such an orthodox yet generous Christian revival, in particular the integral unity of the person, the city and the cosmos; . . . mystical metaphysics combined with cosmic contemplation binds together nature with the supernatural and culture with faith.” \u2014\u00a0Adrian Pabst, Senior Lecturer in Politics, University of Kent, UK<\/p>\n

[Purchase: Wipf & Stock<\/a> | Amazon.com<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Newly available this month: Apology of Culture: Religion and Culture in Russian Thought, edited by Artur Mrowczynski-Van Allen, Teresa Obolevitch, and Pawel Rojek (Pickwick Publications \/ Wipf & Stock; March 2, 2015; 252pp+). [Purchase: Wipf & Stock | Amazon.com] Description: Contemporary philosophy and theology are ever more conscious of the fact that the model of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[10],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2892"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2892"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2893,"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2892\/revisions\/2893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/theologyphilosophycentre.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}